Dear Judge Pastor Re: Decision Conrad Murray

Dear Judge Pastor:

At first I was going to make this blog strictly about Conrad Murray. Then it suddenly occurred to me that this case and your decision was much larger than that! The sad thing about this all is that there are no winners in any of this.  No this verdict cannot bring Michael back. What your decision today can do is stop this from occurring ever again, it will act as a deterrent.  

Looking to the future I am very hopeful for the millions of people which your verdict will affect directly--this includes me as an American.  I don't think many people honestly realize what this case was to the establishment of medical ethics concerning doctor/patient relationships. The gravity of this case made people in the U.S. which weren't even supporters and fans of Michael consider their own medical care and how it is rendered. It made the world take a look at how the very crux of modern medicine operates.

If we are to gain anything out of this it would be to save the lives of any other people which may be going through a situation with a doctor--I cannot say similar.  There should be no more acceptance of this. The case of The People v. Conrad Robert Murray just set a legal precedent concerning doctors and reckless behavior. When that behavior crosses the line into the realm of homicide it is no longer malpractice and the law should become the arbitrator.  It saddens me deeply that something like this could be allowed to transpire at all...  Now this case can be cited.  This case  can be cited in instances where a family has lost a loved one due to the negligence of a member of the medical community.

This is bitter-sweet. What saddens me even more is that Conrad Murray feels that he did nothing wrong here. He missed the message (I bet you the rest of the medical community did indeed get the message!) nor does he even realize that he sacrificed his integrity as a man and his family for $money$.  As a man now his family will be without him for this time frame--he chose to put them at risk for his greed.  Not just that after he gets out where will he be able to seek employment for his trade?  Does he plan to leave the country or change is name and other characteristics?  Conrad Murray will go down in history as infamous.  He will forever be known as the man which killed Michael Jackson.

What saddens me the most about this is Michael's children will grow up without their father.  Michael's mother lost her son forever and she had to bury him--it should not be this way. The mother of Conrad Murray will be without her son for a period  of four years at the age of 80 all because of senseless greed--or to put it in Judge Pastor's words, money for medicine madness ... Michael is survived by his children, family, and extensively rich artistic legacy.  My heart goes out to the family members.  No there are no winners here. 

In reflection I cannot fabricate regarding this, I am relieved for this to be over already . The media frenzy and their conduct was deplorable during this trial.   I mean to say that the sensationalism and the journalism was inept, defunct,  shameful, and down right out deplorable.   The  immense propagandizing and tabloid chronicle--the media displayed.  The blatant disregard for the devastating aspects of this case and the dehumanization and demonizing nature of it  all sickens me at my very core.  This dictates that the media be next on that list regarding legal intervention just as well.  This is not to disregard Freedom of the Press; it is for them to sell the news responsibly and objectively with journalistic integrity.  They chased Michael Jackson all of his life and now that he is gone they continue mercilessly with no provocation.

How can you right a wrong?  How do you begin to fix something that's broken. Mind you it took the life of Michael Jackson for the United States to admit the extensive flaws and loopholes the medical system.  Here we have a doctor which graduated Magna Cum Laude with a degree in pre-medicine and biological sciences and he was a top scholar!   Would anyone expect any logical minded thinker to believe for a moment that Conrad Murray was unaware with respect to the ramifications of his actions? 

Perhaps this will not register with the average individual. Basically this has bypassed the radar undetected!  Nevertheless, his education doesn't justify his  medical conduct.  Bottom line he deviated from his known discipline and exploited the flaws in the system.  These flaws were abused to the advantage of something or someone here.  

This is evident as it is logical to look to the sophistication of studies to determine what qualifications are required to become doctor is it not?  It is  preposterous and highly illogical to disregard what just transpired here.   Where are we as a country when we have allowed this to transpire?  What does this say about society, what dictates the norms and the standard by which we separate humans from savages?  Everything is not acceptable nor is it black or white.  What does this say of where we are headed for the future?

-X1

WILLIAM WAGENER WE THE PEOPLE

WILLIAM WAGENER WE THE PEOPLE

X1:

William is very interesting therefore he's made it to my blog.  The only way you can possibly make it here is if I've taken some sort of vested interest into some statements you've made.  William fights against a multitude of injustices as we all do.  William speaks to many members of the fanbase and he is a self proclaimed non-MJ Supporter or Fan.  This gives him an edge to me because he is able to look at things from a totally unique perspective--the outside looking in.

Because of his status I often find myself looking to people like him for an independent and objective point of view.  There are many people which agree and disagree with various aspects of what has occurred over the past two years and prior to that.  Moreover, I choose to dip into an untapped pool of resource and venture out into different realms to find many different takes on the same issues.  I am open minded and if what you have to say should have one speck of validity to it I will listen.  It doesn't matter who you are or what team you play on all of the aforementioned is irrelevant to me on a personal level.

I have nothing personal against William.  My agenda doesn't regard the deconstruction of principles which he should stand for.  However, I have some questions regarding several statements he's made in one of his videos. This in no way is to be taken as a form of "going on the defensive" for Conrad Murray. I indeed need to address topics on him regarding the very statements William has made to properly present my argument.  Presented below is the video in question which I am directing this commentary to and seeking clarification regarding its content:

X1 Argument #1

"Robert Earl Carter"
 

1. In so many words what William has stated here is very suggestive. If in fact Conrad Murray had taken on a name change prior to taking the position as the personal physician of Michael Jackson regarding the use of  the moniker "Conrad Robert Murray"  vs. "Robert Earl Carter" he was perfectly in his legal rights to do so. The argument isn't regarding if his intentions were sinister.

 

Michael Jackson s Doctor Raids, Death Investigation Not First Brush With Law

I tend to disagree with William here. It is perfectly legal for a person to establish a legal name change under United States Law.  You are allowed to change your name and go by any name which you should so choose.  This is a right which is afforded to every U.S. citizen as it is a basic human right to be referenced as you wish.  Even if Conrad Murray did in fact change his name he had a right to do so with out any speculative insinuations providing this was done under the whole of the law. The fact remains that utilizing the name "Barak Hussein Obama" is an exaggerated reference to plant or attempt to establish a point.  I highly doubt if the authorities would even approve this sort of name change because of the ramifications regarding presidential office.  Although, I can be mistaken; however, there are provisional aspects with respect to name changes as well.  For instance if he chooses to change his name to "Murderer Murray" after his conviction and it was deemed as acceptable under the whole of the law--this too is his right. For Nevada State Law concerning legal name changes please see the PDF documentation below:

Nevada Legal Name Change

X1:

Here is some additional information regarding legal name change in the United States.  This is a perfectly legal action regardless to what state you reside in to the best of my knowledge.  Furthermore, it doesn't matter if "Conrad Robert Murray" is/was a physician or not as this legal name change ability applies to all U.S. Citizens this is a democracy.  Please review the following information below:

_______________________

United States

• State laws regulate name changes in the United States. Several specific federal court rulings have set precedents regarding both court decreed name changes and common law name changes (changing the name at will). A person may be employed, do business, enter into contracts, sue and be sued under any name they choose at will. Such a change carries exactly the same legal weight as a court-decreed name change, as long as it is not done with fraudulent intent. Usually a person can adopt any name desired for any reason. As of 2009, 46 states allow a person legally to change names by usage alone, with no paperwork, but a court order may be required for many institutions (such as banks or government institutions) to officially accept the change.Some states allow transgendered persons to change names either before or after sex reassignment surgery. Although the states (except part of Louisiana) follow common law, there are differences in acceptable requirements; usually a court order is the most efficient way to change names (which would be applied for in a state court), except at marriage, which has become a universally accepted reason for a name change. It is necessary to plead that the name change is not for a fraudulent or other illegal purpose, such as evading a lien or debt or for defaming someone else. The applicant may be required to give a reasonable explanation for wanting to change their name. A fee is generally payable, and the applicant may be required to post legal notices in newspapers to announce the name change. Generally the judge has limited judicial discretion to grant or deny a change of name, usually only if the name change is for frivolous or immoral purposes, such as changing the name to God, Superman, Copyright, Delicious, or Pussycat. In 2004, a Missouri man succeeded in changing his name to They. The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that a name change to 1069 could be denied, but that Ten Sixty-Nine was acceptable (Application of Dengler, 1979); the North Dakota Supreme Court had denied the same request several years before (Petition of Dengler, 1976). In nearly all states, a person cannot choose a name that is intended to mislead (such as adopting a celebrity's name), that is intentionally confusing, or that incites violence; nor can one adopt, as a name, a racial slur, a threat, or an obscenity. Under the federal immigration-and-nationality law, when aliens apply for naturalization, they have the option of asking for their names to be changed upon the grants of citizenship with no additional fees. This allows them the opportunity to adopt more Americanized names. In the 2005 version of Form N-400, Application for Naturalization, Part 1 (D) asks whether persons applying for naturalization would like to change their names. During the naturalization interview, a petition for a name change is prepared to be forwarded to a federal court. The applicant certifies that he or she is not seeking a change of name for any unlawful purpose such as the avoidance of debt or evasion of law enforcement. Such a name change becomes final once a federal court naturalizes an applicant. In some states, individuals are allowed to return to the use of any prior surnames (e.g., maiden names upon divorce). Some states, such as New York, allow married couples to adopt a new surname upon marriage, which may be a hyphenated form of the bride's and groom's names, a combination of parts of their family names, or any new family name they can agree upon adopting as the married name. To maintain a person's identity, it is desirable to obtain a formal order so there is continuity of personal records.

Informal Methods of Legal Name Change

Assumed Name:

• "The "open and notorious" use of a name is often sufficient to allow one to use an assumed name. In some jurisdictions, individuals may register trade names that are distinct from their legal names and are registered with their county clerks, secretaries of state, or other similar government authorities. Individuals who wish to publish materials and not have the publications associated with them may publish under pseudonyms; such a right is protected in the United States of America under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution."

Usage Method:

• "A common law name (i.e. one assumed for a non-fraudulent purpose) is a legal name. In most states a statutory method, while quick and definitive, only supplements the common law method, unless the statute makes itself exclusive. Note that although a person may sue under a common law name, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) have a higher standard and must use the "real" information, allowing the case to be dismissed. In California the "usage method" (changing the name at will under common law) is sufficient to change the name. Not all jurisdictions require that the new name be used exclusively. Any fraudulent use or intent, such as changing the name to the same name as another person's name, may invalidate this type of name change. Specifically in California, Code of Civil Procedure § 1279.5 and Family Code § 2082 regulate common law and court decreed name changes. Code of Civil Procedure § 1279.5 (a) reads, "Except as provided in subdivision (b), (c), (d), or (e), nothing in this title shall be construed to abrogate the common law right of any person to change his or her name." Subdivisions b through e preclude one from changing their name by common law if they are in state prison, on probation, on parole, or been a convicted sex offender. If a person is not in any of these categories, then a common law name change is allowed. Family Code § 2082 also specifically states, "Nothing in this code shall be construed to abrogate the common law right of any person to change one's name."

Official Registration:

• "A legal name change is merely the first step in the name-change process. A person must officially register the new name with the appropriate authorities whether the change was made as a result of a court order, marriage, divorce, adoption, or any of the other methods described above. The process includes notifying various government agencies, each of which may require legal proof of the name change and that may or may not charge a fee. Important government agencies to be notified include the Social Security Administration, Bureau of Consular Affairs (for passports), the United States Postal Service, and the Department of Motor Vehicles (for a new driver's license or state identification card). Additionally the new name must be registered with other institutions such as employers, banks, doctors, mortgage, insurance and credit card companies. Online services are available to assist in this process either through direct legal assistance or automated form processing. Although state requirements differ, it is generally recommended to first register a new name with the Social Security office as some state motor-vehicle departments require updated social security cards to make changes; Arizona is one of these states. Most states require name changes to be registered with their departments of motor vehicles (DMVs) within a certain amount of time. For example, South Carolina,and Wyoming require a name change be registered with their office within ten days. Illinois and Texas require it be registered within 30 days, while North Carolina allows up to 60 days. New York State requires visiting a local motor vehicle office to change the name on all records and documents, but without a definite deadline to do so. The fees for registering a new name vary from state to state. The forms, along with the state-specific requirements, can generally be obtained for free. Many states will require reasons for wanting a name change. For example, in Florida, a court will not grant a petition for a change of name if it finds that (i) the petitioner has ulterior or illegal motives in seeking the name change, (ii) the petitioner's civil rights are suspended, or (iii) granting the name change will invade the property rights (e.g., intellectual property rights) of others."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_change#United_States

_______________________ 

X1 Argument #2:

"We are prosecuting him under a name he did not use most of his life."

-William Wagener

2. I would like to add that the court system will try a person on an alias and include the real name of the person once that determination is made. The name can also be A.K.A. and be perfectly legal!  In fact if you reference Murray by either of those names anyone which has studied him long enough is aware that the individual in fact being referenced is "Conrad Robert Murray".  Besides it is in court records that the defendant stated his name was true as charged.  This is just for good measure as we can establish from Argument #1 that this wouldn't be an issue.  However, please see page one of the PDF documentation below:

Defendant States His Name is True as Charged

_______________________ 

Expert: RunTam38 CA Lawyer replied 1159 days ago:

• "If you are doing business under your legal name, that is the name which should be used in suing you. However, the use in the complaint of the alias which you use for convenience does not invalidate the complaint or the proceedings. The complaint can be amended at any time to show the correct name (or more commonly, to show both names, such as "Jane Doe aka XXXXX XXXXX"). This can be done by oral motion in the court by either party and the judge will simply write in the additional name on the complaint. Even if this is not done, any decision in the case would still be valid. Adding the date of birth is not a requirement. If the correct date was added, then there is no problem in doing so. If the birth date on the complaint is wrong, that can also be fixed by way of a motion to correct the date. This motion can also be made orally by either party and the court can interlineate the correct date. This is a ministerial error which also has no bearing on the validity of any decision in the case."

http://www.justanswer.com/criminal-law/1fgs6-need-know-alias-name-legal-court-when-plaintiff.html

What is an alias search?

• "An alias search uses an assumed name as the search criteria. An alias search provides the ability to perform a party search by any alias names on file. The alias search will only return alias names on file with the Clerk. When the alias search box is checked, the names returned by the search are aliases, and information matching the party's "real" name."

http://www.browardclerk.org/bccoc2/faqpublicsearch.aspx
_______________________ 

X1:

As a prime example here is a document filed by Thomas Mesereau during the 2005 trial for Michael notice that it is filed under the name Michael "Joe" Jackson. However, that didn't dissolve the charges which which were brought against Michael. An alias or pseudonym is not a dissolution or a technicality here in the U.S., only an NOT GUILTY verdict is. *MICHAEL got that:D* Nevertheless, if Michael was convicted Michael "Joe" Jackson, Michael "Joseph" Jackson, or just plain ole Michael Jackson would have gone to prison with a guilty verdict delivered via his peers in a open court of law. Thank goodness this was not the case:) The jury saw through all of the lies.
 
Motion to Seal Regarding 2005 Trial

*A Felony Complaint which is drafted to include the charges is not done by the defendant in that case. This holds true and is applicable in either the recent case of Conrad Robert Murray or the case of Michael "Joe" Jackson in 2005. The complaint is drafted by the authorities. They are solely responsible for both obtaining and processing this information.

_______________________ 

X1 Argument #3

"Secondly we have that time, last week, where defense Attorney Flanagan says, "Isn't he a doctor?".

 -William Wagener

3. An astonishing revelation indeed Mr. Wagener!  I would however beg to differ with regard to the validity of that statement.  The testimony of a witness is to be sorted through via a jury during deliberations for the separation of fact from fiction.  This is indeed done at the discretion of the jury!  It would need to be verified or clarified as to where the witness actually acquired this tidbit of information regarding the credentials of "Conrad Robert Murray" before we could actually take that as a fact.  

Do we know if that witness did a records search on any medical board of the respective states where "Conrad Murray" practiced medicine?  Providing this indeed isn't the case this at best is an assumption or an insinuation which doesn't stand as confirmation of a fact!  This also could have been regarding a specific sort of training or certification in which the prosecution "David Walgren" specifically based his objection upon!

You've also stated that it was not entered on the record in court that "Conrad Robert Murray" was in fact a doctor?  I apologize however this is extremely misleading and a misrepresentation of the court record.  This is also another case of redundant misinformation.  Please see the PDF document which follows this paragraph as it will clarify that there is in fact evidence which has been entered into the court record for The People v. Conrad Robert Murray.


Conrad Murray Medical License Restriction On Order

California Medical Board Conrad Murray Surgeon License

Just for extremely good measure there are the other states which "Conrad Robert Murray" was/is licensed to practice medicine in and here are the records for those states as well respectively listed in PDF format below:

Conrad Murray Texas Medical License


Conrad Murray Nevada Medical License

Video Supportive Evidence:
Ruby Mosley

 

•  "The City of Houston will recognize Ruby Lee Sanders Mosley for her commitment and service to the Acres Homes community by renaming the Acres Homes MSC Auditorium in her honor. This celebratory recognition will take place in the Auditorium of the Acres Homes Multi-Service Center on Feb. 5 at 11 am. Mosley was born in Mexia, TX,  on April 25, 1929 to Willie and Rosie Bell Standmire-Sanders. She attended Prairie View A&M University and moved to Houston in 1948. She became a licensed beautician from Franklin Beauty College, and was later trained in community organizing by Alex Branch, a former community leader in Acres Homes. For 18 years, she worked as a Health Coordinator, advocating to provide water, sewer and other city services in the rural areas of Houston that only had outhouses. In 1982, she worked tirelessly as a City of Houston Community Service Supervisor to provide essential services for the senior citizens and children of the Cuney Homes Housing Development, and established a school for the children living there. The school was later named in her honor."

LIVING LEGEND RUBY MOSLEY

Ruby Mosley Houston Council Meeting (Please view page #4.)

Dr. Joanne Bednarz-Prashad

• "A Houston, Texas, doctor called by the prosecution Monday paid Dr. Murray a compliment Monday afternoon, saying she was "impressed" with Murray's ability to remember a patient and that patient's treatment when she called him "out of the blue." Dr. Joanne Bednarz-Prashad's testimony was important for the prosecution because she is one of the several people who spoke to Dr. Murray on the phone the morning Jackson died. Prosecutors say he effectively abandoned Jackson by leaving his bedroom to talk on the phone that morning. Dr. Bednarz-Prashad called Murray's cell phone to get his advice on a patient he had treated who was about to undergo surgery at a Houston hospital. Most doctors she calls in such circumstances have to call back after consulting medical charts, she said, but Murray recalled the correct information immediately."

Conrad Murray Contacts Dr. Joanne Bednarz-Prashad
_______________________ 

X1 Non-Argument #1



STATE SENATE BILL #312 

State Senate Bill Number 312

As you can see based upon the information below there in fact was a ruling via the Supreme Court regarding prison system overcrowding.  I tend to agree with William here as the timing of this ruling will presumably affect what sentencing Conrad Murray will get.  In my honest opinion I feel that he should be exempt from the ruling however to do so would violate his Constitutional Rights as well! We'll just have to wait until Judge Pastor hands down his ruling regarding this on November 29th, 2011 to see what the outcome will be.  

Many at the beginning of this including myself were under the presumption that he would walk.  I didn't think that he would get convicted at all until I bore witness to the ruling issued via the Court of Appeals. In this ruling the Court of Appeals denied Conrad Murray's Writ of Mandate and immediate stay of trial.  At that point I knew that he was going to jail more than likely.  At that point Conrad Murray ceased to have any defense mechanisms with respect to deeming any of Michael's past prior to 2009 as admissible.  Therefore, we will await the gavel of Judge Pastor to conclude what the end result will be regarding this issue. This remains to be determined with regard to the sentencing.  In addition we will have to see what moves their County Jail System makes afterwards.  We can cross that bridge when we get there.

Supreme Court Opinion Prision Overcrowding

Supreme Court Rules California Prison Overcrowding Unconstitional


*I am going to take this blog entry out just how I started it by exercising a word of caution:

I have nothing personal against William.  My agenda doesn't regard the deconstruction of principles which he should stand for.  However, I have some questions regarding several statements he's made in one of his videos. This in no way is to be taken as a form of "going on the defensive" for Conrad Murray. I indeed need to address topics on him regarding the very statements William has made to properly present my argument.  I am directing my statements as commentary and seeking clarification regarding "William Wagener's" content.

-X1
 

Sources:

Clark County Court

Legal Name Change
Just Answer Criminal Law

http://www.browardclerk.org/bccoc2/faqpublicsearch.aspx

Sealing Motion 2005 Trial
LIVING LEGEND RUBY MOSLEY 
Conrad Murray Contacts Dr. Joanne Bednarz-Prashad
 

THE WENDY WALSH PSYCHOSIS

X1:

THE PSYCHOSIS OF ONE WENDY WALSH

The audacity and total lack of credibility--the arrogance of these doctors turned journalist! When they cross this invisible realm or threshold of the media there is no turning back. Once having crossed the line they become part of the pobagandizing machine! The media uses this machine to convince anyone which is foolish enough to listen. These are the systemic brainwashing techniques used upon many individuals which don't possess the capacity to think for themselves. The masses are brainwashed into the belief that everything which the media publishes or televises is correct!  The public automatically assumes that because these individuals have the backing of a MD, Ph.D,  ABC or a simple doe--re--me, that they are receiving credible information. Please be mindful that this information is being disseminated to the masses via the media worldwide!

Under what justification do you brand an entire fan base or paint many people with the same brush? Moreover, where is your conclusive and documented research evidence which allows you to address the issue of fans or supporters of Michael Jackson? Furthermore, how is it that you presume to know about the fan base of Michael Jackson? Does Ms. Walsh rely on reports by going in the trenches with the supporters & fans during the court dates to see what it is they are attempting to express? Or does Ms. Walsh rely solely upon what society labels and brands people as--you know the stereotypical, mundane, conservative garbage? OK one for the trash receptacles please.



Please see the following Video:

It's evident she hasn't done any research for her to make any type of valid television psychoanalysis or character assessment. She cannot do this regarding Michael's supporters or fans because she has not had ANY OPEN DIALOGUE WITH THEM!

Ms. Walsh apparently requires us to be very psychoanalytical regarding her approach. She's attempting to insinuate that what Conrad Murray did does not warrant any emotion or outrage. I have news for you and your theory Ms. Walsh--the entire world isn't loosing their minds! Ms. Walsh should be stripped of her license she knows nothing about critical thinking, humanity, or the study of the human condition. People are passionate and emotional regarding this trial because it is a travesty of justice and a mockery of the justice system!

As to your implication--regarding the diagnosis of "fantasy" this relays that you're the dreamer here. The entire medical community is up in arms regarding Conrad Murray's actions. I now suggest that you seek therapy if you don't comprehend the reality and ramifications of this situation. It appears that you are out of touch. Please, Ms. Walsh allow me to enlighten you. Here's what your colleagues in the medical community have to state for the record regarding this:

_________________________________

"Dr. Marc Siegel Internist and Associate Professor NYU School of Medicine:

• "The drugs that were found in Michael Jackson’s body included the sedative lorazepam, midazolam, diazepam, lidocaine, ephedrine, and most importantly propofol. These are not the kinds of medications that good medical standards of practice would allow. And yet, very little was done by the board of medical examiners, both in California and in Texas, where he practices, to keep Murray from continuing to practice medicine." "I believe that anyone is “innocent until proven guilty.” But the oath to “do no harm” taken by all physicians must to be taken seriously. Patients and families trust physicians to do good by them. When any patient – including celebrities – requests that we provide them with things that we as scientists know can be harmful, there is very little one can do but to take away the privilege from the health care provider"

http://health.blogs.foxnews.com/tag/dr-conrad-murray/%20

"Dr. Elaina George An Otolaryngologist In Atlanta:

• "No," says Dr. Elaina George, an Otolaryngologist out of Atlanta. Dr. George argues that Jackson was not the one to blame for his untimely death. She explains that physicians have an oath to "not do harm" to their patients and that by giving Jackson such a deadly combination of drugs, Dr. Murray violated that oath. Michael Jackson did not have a chance' was my first thought when I read the report that just came out about what caused his untimely and tragic death," says Dr. George, who generally serves as an advocate for other physicians. "I was unprepared for the absolute disregard for the first tenant of the doctors' Hippocratic Oath – 'First do no harm." There was no way that harm would not have come to Mr. Jackson. It was beyond negligent to give him a mixture of three different kinds of sedatives, a muscle relaxant, an antidepressant in addition to Propofol, a general anesthetic that is only used in an operating room setting (because it can stop someone’s breathing). Each of these drugs by themselves can be lethal, but together it is a recipe that will almost definitely kill someone. I can think of no medical scenario that would justify mixing these kinds of drugs. Hopefully, Mr. Jackson’s death will teach us that prescription drugs, though helpful are no substitute for doctors doing everything in their power to protect the health of their patients, including just saying no when it is appropriate.Anna Nicole and Heath Ledger are two celebrities that died from drug interactions. The death of Michael Jackson and his relationship with Dr. Murray is the most recent example that highlights the danger of the ‘doctor on retainer’. This relationship is based on a contract that makes the doctor an employee, in essence changing a relationship that should be equal, to one where the patient can dictate the course of treatment. This shift in power can potentially blur the lines that must be maintained for a healthy doctor/patient relationship. It then can place a physician in a position where he/she may be prescribing medication in a way that is not clinically appropriate because the patient demands it. This needs to be examined and changed. As a society we need to take a look at the culture of prescription medication as the cure all. There is a perception that we can treat anything by taking a pill. This concept has been fostered by the pharmaceutical industry and their constant advertising. There are pills to make you happy, perform better sexually, help your memory, make you feel younger etc… In reality all of these medications have one thing in common; they simply manage the symptoms instead of healing the problem. Perhaps the best thing that can come out of the tragedy of Michael Jackson’s death is the examination of our culture of disease. Maybe it will change the paradigm to prevention and to healing disease instead of managing it with an endless list of prescription medications."

http://www.bvonmoney.com/2009/08/24/michael-jackson-murder-conrad-murray/
http://elainageorge.wordpress.com/

Dr. Lloyd Saberski, A Yale University Anesthesiologist Editor In Chief The Pain Clinic:

• "Propofol has no place in a household," said Dr. Lloyd Saberski, a Yale University anesthesiologist and editor in chief of the journal The Pain Clinic. "This alone is a deviation, and many laws were likely violated just to get the propofol there."

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MichaelJackson/story?id=7994823&page=2

Dr. Howard Nearman, Chairman Of The Anesthesiology DepartmentUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center Cleveland:

• "Moreover, an injection of the drug requires that someone be present to continually administer it intravenously, said Dr. Howard Nearman, chairman of the anesthesiology department at University Hospitals Case Medical Center in Cleveland. Nearman said there "absolutely" had to be a second party with Jackson if indeed he was using the drug to sleep."

• "But despite the effects and risk profile of the drug, Nearman said that patients who've had the drug describe it as inducing "a very pleasant sleep" that "has the potential to be habit-forming."

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MichaelJackson/story?id=7994823&page=2

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MichaelJackson/story?id=7994823&page=3

Dr. Richard Page, Head Of Cardiology University Of Washington Medical Center:

• "Propofol is an agent that requires very close monitoring and is often limited only to use by anesthesiologists," said Dr. Richard Page, head of cardiology at the University of Washington medical center. "The main issue with this agent is respiratory depression, which in turn could cause cardiac arrest."
  

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MichaelJackson/story?id=7994823&page=2

Dr. Brian Olshansky, Cardiologist University Of Iowa:

• "It is a very dangerous drug," said Dr. Brian Olshansky, a cardiologist at the University of Iowa who said he often uses the drug to place patients in deep sedation for certain heart procedures. "It is not for sleep. I cannot imagine anyone would use this outside a very regulated environment such as the availability of emergency respiratory equipment."

• "It rapidly induces unconsciousness and apnea," Olshansky said. "People stop breathing within seconds of being given the drug."

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MichaelJackson/story?id=7994823&page=2

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MichaelJackson/story?id=7994823&page=3

Dr. Jeff Guy Vanderbilt University:

• "These characteristics of the drug make it an exceedingly unusual choice for abuse, said Dr. Jeff Guy of Vanderbilt University, who said such a situation would represent "a quantum leap in the issue of substance abuse."

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MichaelJackson/story?id=7994823&page=3

Daniel K Sokol, Lecturer: Medical Ethics & Law, St George’s, University of London:

• In medical school we teach students to be aware of the power differential between doctor and patient. In a hospital setting, patients may be sick, frightened, and medically unsophisticated. Doctors, on the other hand, are generally healthy, medically knowledgeable, and in a familiar environment. Such is the typical clinical encounter."

http://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b3535.extract

*Quotes As Cited Above From X1 Blogger Hippocratic Oath 2 Blog Entry:

http://insanity-x-livesx1.blogspot.com/2011/01/conrad-murray-hippocratic-oath-2.html
_________________________________


Do these members of the medical community--which would more than likely be ashamed to be mentioned in the same sentence as you appear to be having any delusional "fantasies"? The Michael Jackson base which you have just banded as "fantasy" are the ones which have the medical community at large supporting and supplying them with facts. Ms. Walsh what pages or websites did you visit to come to this conclusion? You surely haven't visited any of mine. If you visited one of my sites you'd be clear for the record and not exhibiting delusional tendencies. To state that we are "all in a fantasy" is a broad sweep by definition.  Lady get real it seems we supporters have more sense to back what we state with valid and conclusive evidence than you do. Ms. Walsh, what have you got to say for your psychological or journalistic integrity now?

-X1

Counterfeit Court Reporters & Calumniation

AN IN-DEPTH INSIGHT TO PUBLIC RECORDS & COURT TRANSCRIPTS

X1:)

Yes people it's me again here to tell you all about obtaining court transcripts and records. This time around, you will get the truth as I know no other way to do this.  If there is anyone claiming that they are being charged exuberant fees for obtaining court documents and that they need donations I would ask why?  Yes, transcripts can get expensive depending on how many pages you require.

There is actually no need to obtain any transcripts due to the fact that the trial will be televised. What we should do in all actuality is record the actual trial! Moreover, this in fact means that you can see this and what is being stated verbatim as opposed to looking through transcripts. Furthermore, I question the accuracy of sites doing this as some of them leave out huge portions of the transcripts.  I also need to state for the record that if it is not in the televised version of the trial more than likely it will be sealed or redacted in the court transcripts. 

To ensure accuracy it is suggested that you watch the proceedings from television as you can get a better understanding from them. I do hope that the coverage for the trial is in real-time and not recorded so that no editing or omissions are possible. The televised proceedings will be as close to that court room as you can get without being physically present.

___________________

‎

• "The judge also noted that there may be times during the trial when he will deem it appropriate to “obscure some witnesses,” so he’ll order the cameras turned off. He didn’t state which witnesses, but it’s possible he is thinking of Michael Jackson’s children who could be called to testify."

http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/08/judge-rules-michael-jacksons-doctor-trial-will-be-televised/

 

• "Any court, party, or person who has purchased a transcript may, without paying a further fee to the reporter, reproduce a copy or portion thereof as an exhibit pursuant to court order or rule, or for internal use, but shall not otherwise provide or sell a copy or copies to any other party or person."

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/GOV/1/8/5/9/s69954
___________________

X1: 

I have to question their motivation--getting people to click ads/requesting donations  so that they can get paid from your patronage. If you notice this blog has no ads or donation requests present. I have elected to refrain from collecting money for what it is that I do and so have my colleagues. I do this for Michael. I like to write and it is my personal way of thanking him for all of the artistry, dedication, and life's lessons I have been taught via his medium of music.   We are nearing a time of true intentions being revealed. I welcome this with open arms (X1 Smiles). If you do what you do for Michael from your heart--there is no price tag on any of it. 

To further expand if there is a reason that you require monetary support from the supporters and fans be admirable and honest about it--do not seek to deceive! I am quite sure that there is lots of overhead in any donations procured from any website which is stating to publish transcripts. This is just a simple matter of math here and what you are getting per click when it comes to ads or donations. There is no sure fire way to establish the amount of money which is procured by requesting donations from any individuals or what someone's good hard earned cash is being used for.  Please note that some documents may or may not fall under the scope of public record. You may be able to get these public records (court records) at no cost or only minimal costs over the web yourself, or in some cases, media outlets may post them for you which has been the case for many court filings already.

__________________

Transcripts:

X1 & BX:

 BX:

There have been noticeable developments regarding a website where court transcripts of the hearings since the first arraignment of Dr. Conrad Murray had been uploaded to. The links to the relevant court dates and transcripts are disabled now. The background for this is that providing access to these transcripts is in direct violation of California law:
______________________

"(d)Any court, party, or person who has purchased a transcript may, without paying a further fee to the reporter, reproduce a copy or portion thereof as an exhibit pursuant to court order or rule, or for internal use, but shall not otherwise provide or sell a copy or copies to any other party or person."

CAL. GOV. CODE § 69954 : California Code - Section 69954
______________________
 

 BX:

The owner of this website had issues with copyrighted materials before (I am not saying the official court transcripts are copyrighted as they are not - I am drawing a structural parallel here) where the source was not researched properly. Now the owner of this website ran into another issue, quite publicly again, because apparently there was no or very limited research on the nature of the material under question carried out. It strikes me as if someone - desiring to be the first beyond the stakes - forgets what Thomas Edison once said:

• "Genius is one percent inspiration, ninety-nine percent perspiration."

Or, in the words of some John Ruskin:

• "In Notes by Mr Ruskin on His Collection of Drawings by the late J. M. W. Turner, 1878, he made the observation that: I know of no genius but the genius of hard work."

 (Background for both quotes provided at: http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/genius-is-one-percent-perspiration-ninety-nine-percent-perspiration.html)
 ______________________

X1: 


Nevertheless, transcripts and court documents are not unattainable. Court transcripts can be huge--I mean many pages and very long due in part to their double spacing and formatting standards. As a matter of fact, court transcripts can be obtained by contacting the clerk of the court. In Los Angeles, California the court clerk will then direct you to a court reporter to discuss the transcript you are placing an order for. There are plenty of U.S. Federal & State laws which facilitate obtaining court documents in general below you may reference a few applicable laws which govern this:

__________________ 

• "Access audio or video recordings of court proceedings. With Court Transcripts, you can easily access state and federal appellate oral argument and trial transcripts. In addition, you can open video or audio recordings of proceedings directly from Westlaw – taking advantage of side-by-side syncing of text transcripts with streaming media. Court Transcripts give you important nonverbal clues. Court Transcripts allows you to go beyond the written word to observe visual information and nonverbal clues otherwise obtained only in the courtroom."

Use Court Transcripts to:

• 1. *Research, assess and prepare expert and lay witnesses

• 2. *Understand how other attorneys present arguments and evidence to persuade a judge or jury

• 3. *Study a judge's demeanor, tendencies and subject-matter expertise

• 4. * Formulate litigation strategy

http://west.thomson.com/westlaw/litigator/court-transcripts/default.aspx

• A court reporter, stenotype reporter, voice writer, stenomask writer, digital reporter, or transcriber is a person whose occupation is to transcribe spoken or recorded speech into written form, typically using machine shorthand or a voice silencer and digital recorder to produce official transcripts of court hearings, depositions and other official proceedings. There are three major methods of live person court reporting: digitally recorded, machine shorthand, and voice writing. Machine shorthand allows the stenotype reporter to keep up with the flow of speech so that no words are missed. The voice writer, on the other hand, repeats verbatim what attorneys, witnesses, and others are saying in a proceeding. Digitally recorded proceedings provide the ability to verify the written record as verbatim.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_reporter

• transcript- n. -the written record of all proceedings, including testimony, in a trial, hearing or deposition (out of court testimony under oath). Jurisdictions vary as to whether the attorneys' final arguments are recorded, with the Federal Court Reporter Act requiring inclusion, but not all states. A copy of the transcript may be ordered from the court reporter and a fee paid for the transcription and first copy; if the opposing party also wants a copy, the cost will not include the transcription fee. In most appeals a copy of the transcript is required so that the court of appeals can review the entire proceedings in the trial court. Copies of depositions may be ordered for a fee from the court reporter who took down the testimony. Transcripts are not printed from the record unless transcription is requested.  

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Primary+transcript

• In an October 22, 2002 Memorandum, the Administrative Offices of the United States Courts clarified ownership issues for court transcripts:

Transcripts of court proceedings are not original works of authorship subject to the protection of the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. 101). Even if the transcript were a proper subject of the Act, official court reporters would not be able to seek a copyright because their transcripts are prepared as part of their official duties and thus come within the "work of the United States Government" exception.. Therefore, certified transcripts filed with the clerk of court may not contain statements or seals which purport to restrict the distribution or copying of the transcript by the clerk's office or by the public. Because transcripts filed with the clerk are public records, they may be used, reproduced and provided to attorneys, parties, and the general public without additional compensation to the court reporter, contractor, or transcriber.Since Court Reporters are mandated to file their transcripts with the Clerk, then it is without question that transcripts at any stage of the process are public records, and not the property of the Court Reporter.

http://www.pwc-sii.com/Research/research/courtreporters.htm

• We have found no authority to justify requiring plaintiffs, and derivatively their attorney to pay a fee to a court reporter for a transcript copy the reporter did not make but, rather, that they legally obtained from another source by independent means. On the contrary, both broad principle and particular holdings undermine the notion that court reporters may demand a “missed fee” whenever someone obtains a copy of a transcript that can be traced back to an original transcript the reporter had made—and was paid for making—for someone else."In broad terms, [the court reporter's] fee claim rests on the tacit premise that court reporters in some legal sense own the content of the transcripts they prepare, such that they are entitled to remuneration whenever a copy of a transcript is made (even if they played no role in making the copy). To accept this premise would effectively give court reporters a “copyright” in a mere transcription of others’ statements, contrary to black letter copyright law. See 2 William F. Patry, Patry on Copyright, Ch. 4 Noncopyrightable Material, § 4.88 (Updated Sept. 2008) (court reporters are not “authors of what they transcribe and therefore cannot be copyright owners of the transcript of court proceedings”)." And there is a line of cases holding that transcripts independently accessed (such as by simply requesting the case file from the court clerk) may be viewed and copied as an alternative to purchasing a copy from the court reporter. See Kinan v. City of Boston, 112 F.R.D. 206, 208 (D. Mass. 1986); Hawley v. Hall, 131 F.R.D. 578, 583 (D. Nev. 1990); C.P.C. P’ship Bardot Plastics, Inc. v. P.T.R., Inc., 96 F.R.D. 184, 185 (E.D. Pa. 1982); see also Stanley v. Henderson, 590 F.2d 752, 753 (8th Cir. 1979) (noting counsel may obtain copies of appeal transcript from clerk); Schroer v. United States, 250 F.R.D. 531, 535-37 (D. Colo. 2008) (rejecting, under post-2000 Rules (see supra note 1), party’s effort to require immediate filing of transcript with clerk to enable informal copying, not because copying is improper but because party failed to justify burdening the court with filing of as-yet-unused transcripts).

http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/08/10th-cir-court-reporters-do-not-own-a-copyright-in-the-transcripts-that-they-prepare/

The California Public Records Act

Judicial Council of California Administrative Office of the Courts

• We have found no authority to justify requiring plaintiffs, and derivatively their attorney to pay a fee to a court reporter for a transcript copy the reporter did not make but, rather, that they legally obtained from another source by independent means. On the contrary, both broad principle and particular holdings undermine the notion that court reporters may demand a “missed fee” whenever someone obtains a copy of a transcript that can be traced back to an original transcript the reporter had made—and was paid for making—for someone else."In broad terms, [the court reporter's] fee claim rests on the tacit premise that court reporters in some legal sense own the content of the transcripts they prepare, such that they are entitled to remuneration whenever a copy of a transcript is made (even if they played no role in making the copy). To accept this premise would effectively give court reporters a “copyright” in a mere transcription of others’ statements, contrary to black letter copyright law. See 2 William F. Patry, Patry on Copyright, Ch. 4 Noncopyrightable Material, § 4.88 (Updated Sept. 2008) (court reporters are not “authors of what they transcribe and therefore cannot be copyright owners of the transcript of court proceedings”)." And there is a line of cases holding that transcripts independently accessed (such as by simply requesting the case file from the court clerk) may be viewed and copied as an alternative to purchasing a copy from the court reporter. See Kinan v. City of Boston, 112 F.R.D. 206, 208 (D. Mass. 1986); Hawley v. Hall, 131 F.R.D. 578, 583 (D. Nev. 1990); C.P.C. P’ship Bardot Plastics, Inc. v. P.T.R., Inc., 96 F.R.D. 184, 185 (E.D. Pa. 1982); see also Stanley v. Henderson, 590 F.2d 752, 753 (8th Cir. 1979) (noting counsel may obtain copies of appeal transcript from clerk); Schroer v. United States, 250 F.R.D. 531, 535-37 (D. Colo. 2008) (rejecting, under post-2000 Rules (see supra note 1), party’s effort to require immediate filing of transcript with clerk to enable informal copying, not because copying is improper but because party failed to justify burdening the court with filing of as-yet-unused transcripts).

http://senlawoffice.com/exclusiverights/2009/08/10th-cir-court-reporters-do-not-own-a-copyright-in-the-transcripts-that-they-prepare/

• When the legislature enacted CPRA, it expressly declared that "access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person in this state."Indeed, in California "access to government records has been deemed a fundamental interest of citizenship" and has emphasized that "maximum disclosure of the conduct of governmental operations [is] to be promoted by the act." By promoting prompt public access to government records, the CPRA is "intended to safeguard the accountability of government to the public." As the California Supreme Court recognized in CBS v. Block: Implicit in a democratic process is the notion that government should be accountable for its actions. In order to verify accountability, individuals must have access to government files. Such access permits checks against the arbitrary exercise of official power and secrecy in the political process.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Public_Records_Act

2010 California Public Records Act

• "On November 2, 2004, California voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition 59. Commonly called the Sunshine Amendment, it added Article I, Section 3(b) to the California Constitution, which reads in part:"

•  "The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business, and, therefore, the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies shall be open to public scrutiny."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_information_law_in_California

___________________

How Writers & Bloggers Can Use F.O.I.A To Their Advantage: 

X1:

http://www.foia.cia.gov/

http://www.fbi.gov/foia/ 

Writer Charles Thompson used this law to gain access to the files that the FBI had about Michael this is an interesting law. This law makes the U.S. Government accountable for the disclosure of agency files. Perhaps you recall the FBI releasing these files to the public which shed light on various investigations which were done regarding Michael and how they all concluded no wrong doing.

The Freedom Of Information Act (F.O.I.A.)

___________________

• "In response to Freedom of Information Act requests, the Bureau has released its investigative files on the late entertainer Michael Jackson, who died earlier this year. The records total 333 pages, divided into seven files. They detail the FBI’s investigation of a man who threatened to kill Jackson, as well as various forms of assistance to California authorities in two cases involving allegations that Jackson had abused children. It should be emphasized that none of these allegations were ever proven in court. The files are available on the Freedom of Information Act/Privacy website, but here is a quick rundown of what they contain."

• "The first file—9A-LA-142276—was opened by the Los Angeles FBI office when it was asked to lead a federal case against a California man already under arrest for sending numerous threatening letters. The man—who falsely claimed to be the son of mobster John Gotti—had staked out Jackson's house and threatened to kill him, the U.S. president, and others. He was ruled incompetent to stand trial and sent to prison for two years."

• "The second and third files—62D-LA-162715 and 62D-LO-11779—involve the Bureau’s support of local law enforcement. In 1993, the Los Angeles and the Santa Barbara Police departments formed a task force to investigate an allegation that Jackson had molested a young boy. FBI field divisions in Los Angeles and New York—as well as Bureau overseas offices in Manila and London—provided assistance in that case. Investigators gathered public records on Jackson, interviewed a potential witness, and followed various other leads. The FBI assisted Los Angeles Police Department detectives who traveled to the Philippines to interview possible witnesses and shared news reports from London about a potential victim. The U.S. Attorney declined to pursue a federal investigation, including a possible violation of the Mann Act (transporting a minor across state lines for immoral purposes), and no charges were filed by the state."

• "The fourth file—95A-HQ-1148159—concerns a 1995 request by a U.S. Customs agent in Florida that the Bureau examine a VHS videotape connected with Jackson to see if it contained child pornography. Forensic specialists discovered that the tape was a “poor quality third or fourth generation recording” and informed the Customs Service of their findings."

http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2009/december/jackson_122209

• The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is a federal law that allows for the full or partial disclosure of previously unreleased information and documents controlled by the United States Government. The Act defines agency records subject to disclosure, outlines mandatory disclosure procedures and grants nine exemptions to the statute. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 4, 1966 (Public Law 89-554, 80 Stat. 383; Amended 1996, 2002, 2007), and went into effect the following year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Information_Act_%28United_States%29

________________________

Navigational Aspects: Understanding The Pacer System/Court Clerks:

X1:

There is a nation-wide system called Pacer in place where you can retrieve court documents--You may find it at: www.pacer.gov. Here is some helpful information if you are looking to navigate the Pacer system. Pacer is an electronic system which has many court documents. Pacer can seem intimidating at first however once you get the hang of it--it is smooth sailing and sunny sky's ahead:)  I think anyone that is looking to do this seriously will find this information very useful as a guide. It is important that everyone understand that if you print a huge amount of case documents which are not what you are looking for it will not cost you a small fortune. The information below is regarding what attorneys submit to Pacer as well as the actual Pacer Electronic Guide so that you will know your way around when you get there. I am about helping people get information not hoarding it for monetary gain. Hey give it a shot:)

If they are not accessible via electronic means you can contact the respective court clerk and request information regarding seeking to obtain a copy of transcripts or public court documents (those which have not been sealed.)

Pacer Electronic Filing For Attorneys

• "Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) is an electronic public access service that allows users to obtain case and docket information from federal appellate, district and bankruptcy courts, and the PACER Case Locator via the Internet. PACER is provided by the federal Judiciary in keeping with its commitment to providing public access to court information via a centralized service."

http://www.pacer.gov/

Public Access to Court Electronic Records

________________________

• "PACER charges $0.08 per page retrieved. This applies to both the pages of search results and the pages of documents you retrieve. The charge for any single document is capped at $2.40, the equivalent of 30 pages. The cap does not apply to name searches, reports that are not case-specific, and transcripts of federal court proceedings. If you accrue a total of less than $10.00 worth of charges in any given quarter, fees are waived for that quarter."

http://www.pacer.gov/

Central District
Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center
210 West Temple St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012

http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/Locations/ui/location.aspx?loc=CCB&tab=2&d=Directory

• "The public may not have access to an arrest report or any document containing a victim’s name, address, or telephone number. Photocopies of public records can be requested in the Clerk's Office at the appropriate Court location. Please refer to the current Fee Schedule for copy and certification fees."

http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/search/

Criminal * Case Records

• (213) 974-6141

• (213) 974-6142

Criminal * Clerk's Office
FLOOR 2    

• (213) 974-6141

• (213) 974-6142

http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/Locations/ui/location.aspx?loc=CCB&tab=2&d=Directory
________________________

HEAD IN SAND ACTION:

X1 & BX:

X1:

So you see anyone at all can get their hands on these documents. It is not necessary to click until you have Carpal Tunnel Syndrome just to line the pockets of anyone else. Thus, being that the trial of Conrad Murray will be a televised and public event there is no need to obtain court transcripts. One more thing while the words on your site may be copywritten the court documents are not. A copywritten work is an original work. So therefore, all of this attempting to copyright court documents is very amateur as any skilled person knows that this is not possible!  This is not only silly it is embarrassing as well! Beyond that Article 10 of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights which is part of the U.N. Charter Law states that Conrad Murray has the right to a fair and public hearing. This is the way things are set up not just here in the U.S.--this is established under U.N. International Charter Law as well. Even criminals have a certain set of rights. Again, his trial will be televised so what is the reason to spend endless hours in gaining access to these court transcripts?
________________________

[The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 10.]

• "On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."

• "* Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him."

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a10
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights 

________________________

BX:

We should make it very clear here that if you study the documents adduced that court transcripts are not deemed to be original work. They are mere transcripts of what other people stated in court. The court reporters or the courts do not create this content, they transcribe/record this content for further reference.

With the Sixth Amendment, a defendant is entitled to not just a speedy, but also a public trial as this will ensure the public can witness a trial and thus wrongs may be prevented:

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
________________________ 


"Amendment VI to the U.S. Constitution:

• "Was adopted as part of the Bill of Rights in 1791. Some states had made their ratification of the Constitution contingent upon such adoption, reflecting a perceived need to limit the federal government's power to investigate, prosecute, and punish crime. The original Constitution had few provisions relating to the criminal process, but of the twenty‐six separate rights specified in the first eight amendments, fifteen are aimed specifically at that process. The Sixth Amendment itself specifies seven rights applicable “in all criminal prosecutions”: (1) speedy trial; (2) public trial; (3) trial by jury; (4) notice of the accusation; (5) confrontation of opposing witnesses; (6) compulsory process for obtaining favorable witnesses; and (7) the assistance of counsel (see Counsel, Right to). Although the Sixth Amendment guarantees these rights only with respect to the federal government, the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 began a process of selective incorporation of the Bill of Rights provisions into its Due Process Clause. All Sixth Amendment rights have been incorporated and thus are also applicable to the states (see Incorporation Doctrine)."

http://www.answers.com/topic/amendment-vi-to-the-u-s-constitution

• "Fair trial Definition - Noun : a trial that is conducted fairly, justly, and with procedural regularity by an impartial judge and in which the defendant is afforded his or her rights under the U.S. Constitution or the appropriate state constitution or other law Among the factors used to determine whether a defendant received a fair trial are these: the effectiveness of the assistance of counsel, the opportunity to present evidence and witnesses, the opportunity to rebut the opposition's evidence and cross-examine the opposition's witnesses, the presence of an impartial jury, and the judge's freedom from bias."

http://research.lawyers.com/glossary/fair-trial.html

________________________

BX:

The court records/transcripts are a means for the broad public to convince themselves that the proceedings are lawful and observe the constitution of the United States of America. Not all interested citizens may fit into a tiny court room. TV coverage will not remedy this as there is no guarantee everything is covered with no omissions or specific cuts or comments that convey opinions. Court transcripts/records are complete, real-time and impartial.

Thus, not just that court transcripts/records do not constitute original works, they also serve an important role in relation to the observation of constitutional rights. For these two reasons the are made accessible for the broad public to ensure the people have access to them when they wish so.

Obtaining court documents or court transcripts is not magic. Any of us can do this- we have shown you the ways. It is important, that we, the public, obtain as much first-hand and factual information about the People v. Conrad Murray as we can. This is nothing to boast about or sensationalize - Michael was not boastful either but is described as a humble and modest person. It is something we just need to do - for Michael.

(X1 Smiles)

-X1