♥ *His Music Will Live Forever*♥

You know it's interesting this time around last year as I look back I can remember the many people in the community just "Estate Bashing". From the beginning I've been one of "those people" which defended actions of the estate. Because of my views I am not well liked in the community--let's put that out there. Not that it bothers me as I have a way of alienating people which I can see coming from a mile away because I stick to my convictions. 

 

 *Therefore, I'm good with that.

(Insert Smile)*

Anyway, back to the estate and why I chose to support it. After Michael had passed on what I saw was a calamity. In my view there was so much disorder and chaos! This wasn't just involving the business aspect but it was the entire fan base. Everyone was so divided on their views. Some thought that the family would be best representative of the estate and very few thought like I did.

*Yes, this was in the beginning.*

While I respect the Jacksons as a family they've made some not so good business choices in the past. I am not a Jackson hater. I've listened to their music growing up just like everyone else. They're a part of my childhood years just as well. They're also an integral part of history for me.

 

What blew my mind was that everyone had a fight going on. I recall when the Michael album came out how much division there was all because some had their own interpretations that the music included on the album was fake.

*You see, I have what you call a gift and a curse; I possess technical knowledge. I have a good comprehension of what it takes to record. I also comprehend how record labels can store outtakes and different vocal segments in a bank (some reference this as a vault) for many years.

Just because a particular song may not make the final cut on an album doesn't mean it's totally scrapped forever in many cases. I was the first to do a comparison of 2,000 Watts & Breaking News which some have heard on the Internet. Many others have done comparisons as well. However, I knew what I heard was Michael, minus all the pitch bending, the posthumous techniques, and the technology which was applied to get his vocals to match the music production. This is not an easy task.

I believe that the Jacksons knew that it was Michael on those tracks. Perhaps they were just very angry and hurt at the way everything played out regarding John Branca. Yes, you know the will, the trust--the estate as a whole. Deep down I think they were angry because they may have felt they should control Michael's assets. They’re Michael's family members for better or worse--after all... In the aftermath of it all Michael's estate still flourishes. Amidst the lawsuits, satellite estates, and recreated charities Michael still wins. He's equally as groundbreaking and epic as he was yesterday and still is today.

 

What I find amazing is that during the eye of evolution in the storm I've witnessed that estate transition from a point of cyclonic and brute force to evolve into what it is today. The BAD 25 ERA is upon us now and for the most part I can see some positive reaction from the community regarding this latest project. It is a very different tone from what it was back then when the Michael album was first released. People are actually looking forward to BAD 25 and everyone wants that darn BAD 25 jacket LOL!

Michael's estate is flourishing according to plan headed for the billions in profit margin. Sony/ATV coupled with the merger and acquisition of EMI has ensured that. This was what's called a business power move. This is on the next level to mega proportions. This what Michael ventured into so many years ago when he made an investment into the Beatles Catalog. Should Michael have been physically here to take part in this acquisition he would be a considered a business mogul! 

(Insert  Huge Smile Here)!!! *Does anyone realize this?*

The scope of this has changed drastically since we first began with the news on June 25th, 2009. We all miss Michael a great deal. I think it's safe to say that we miss him beyond what's possible to communicate through the expression of words. They're just not good enough or adequate enough to express this successfully.

For all the people which held Michael back or did anything which caused him any strife even in the afterlife he is doing it. Don't you just ♥ LOVE ♥ that? There are entities and forces which can't be controlled even in death there's life.

♥ *His Music Will Live Forever*.... ♥

-X1

For more information about Bad 25 click The Bad 25 Jacket Logo below:

LOCKDOWN: THE CONRAD MURRAY CHRONICLES

The CONFINEMENT of Constance:

Welcome to this episode of Connie's Chronicles and I have been designated to be your host, X1.  No this is not a joke whatsoever, I am about to read this dude. Perhaps I need to re-read the verdict for him just in case he has earwax buildup! Conrad Murray (A.K.A. Connie according to TMZ) appears to be playing the media card here--AGAIN!  Is it just me or does anyone seem to notice at the most inopportune times he seems to appear in the press with some wild tabloid story? Mostly this occurs during a significant day for the community.  

Whensoever there is a large event it seems he rears his convicted head like the plague--a horror! What an unwanted pest--does anyone have a can of Raid handy?  Poof, be gone, and please do go away!  This time he decided to appear unforgivably right before the third anniversary of Michael Jackson's death--and he also had the audacity to do this on June 25th, 2012!

(A Video Is Hidden Here Above)

Tell me, what are the odds that there is always an issue involving him or his camp on selective days? These issues coincidentally have a tendency to appear at a heightened state--at times when tributes are being done in remembrance of Michael Jackson.  There aren't that many coincidental instances of chance here.  What this appears to be is that Conrad Murray has gotten well versed in how to exploit a situation to his best advantage. His statements can't appear genuine because the releases to the public seem to be scheduled (on or around June 25th or August 29th)!  On or around these days in particular he always seems to have some issue.

____________________


DING IN THIS CORNER

X1 THE UNDISPUTED CHAMP:

Conrad Murray tried to pull a Floyd Mayweather on the judicial and corrections system.  There's just two things about that:

Here's a little background on Floyd so you can see clearly where I'm about to go with this here:

____________________

• "Floyd Mayweather Jr. got hammered by a judge, who just sentenced him to serve 90 days in jail for beating up his baby mama in front of their kids. Floyd was sentenced to 6 months in jail, but 3 months of that sentence was suspended.  He also gets 3 days credit for time he has already served. TMZ broke the story ... the boxer was arrested in September 2010 -- after his ex-girlfriend accused him of striking her "multiple times in the head with his fist" and then threatening to kill her. Floyd struck a plea deal with prosecutors in the case -- in which he pled guilty to misdemeanor domestic violence ... in exchange for getting a pass on the felony battery charge."

BOXER FLOYD MAYWEATHER 90 Day JAIL STINT

• "Floyd Mayweather, Jr. says he's begun to shrivel up into a puny regular person during his first 12 days in the big house ... and he's worried he won't be able to bounce back in time to save his boxing career.  Mayweather made the statements in new legal papers ... in which he begs the judge to release him from the Clark County Detention Center in Nevada and let him serve the remaining time in his 3-month sentence on house arrest.  FYI -- Floyd is currently locked up for beating his baby mama in front of their kids last year.  In the docs, Mayweather says he spends 23 hours-per-day locked in isolation for his own safety. But he claims the imprisonment is taking a "cruel and inhuman" toll on his rippling physique because he can't train at a world class level while serving his time.  Mayweather claims his doctor is concerned about his "dehydrated appearance, his lack of muscle tone and his dry mucus membranes." Floyd says his doctor also "expressed deep concern for [Floyd's] health and explained that any lengthy period of time with an inappropriate diet, coupled with lack of regular exercise, will most likely lead to irreversible damage to Mr. Mayweather's physique." Floyd's doctor also told the court he's concerned about Floyd's diet ... because he used to eat 3,000 to 4,000 calories per day ... and now, the doc believes FM is eating less than 800." 

Jail is KILLING My Boxing Career 
____________________ 

#1. Although undefeated boxing champion Floyd Mayweather and Conrad Murray both have instances of domestic violence on their records they are not exactly carbon copies of each other.

#2. Floyd Mayweather--no matter what you think about him and his actions which are certainly not acceptable under any circumstances--DID NOT administer Propofol to his patient unwarranted without any legitimate surgical procedures being performed thus resulting in the death of said patient.

OK now that we've gotten into the sinister particulars of the situation at hand let's address the actual allegations and claims made via Constance & his camp:

____________________

Queen of The Dragon:

Please don't take what I'm about to say in a disrespectful nature--this is in no way being stated to disrespect any "REAL WOMAN"!  However, he needs to tell this woman to shut up! She is saying things which relate to his health that don't make him seem in as much of a dire situation as he has proclaimed.

Perhaps her instrument would be better utilized in other areas where she is useful!  I don't see what she has done here as useful regarding grounds which Constance (Conrad Murray) has stated deemed him worthy of an early release due to his health--do you?  And what about all that reading and the migraine headaches any individual would normally get from a tumor?  Oh and what about his inability to wash his personals and him being well liked and around people in that state?  What does this say about his alleged issues with hygiene?  What does this say about his solitary confinement?

Then he wants to be a jailhouse professor--oh what gives...Doesn't he realize that he has to read and be around people in a most vile way regarding the hygienically correct aspect of this!???  It appears that Conrad Murray A.K.A. Constance won't man up and do his laundry in that jailhouse sink!  What does he require after all that his jailhouse issued boxers be starched and pressed--gimmie a break!

____________________

ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE ME

X1:

 

What is this has Constance been listening to Tupac Shakur while on lockdown?

OK now that we've gotten into the sinister particulars of the situation at hand let's address the actual claims made via Connie & his camp:

Therefore, please allow me to put things in their proper perspective and get it right on the first go round!

#1. The Jury handed down the guilty verdict.

#2. Judge Pastor did the sentencing and issued the maximum sentence allowable by law.

#3. Now, I'm doing the commentary!

 

It appears dude has this all misconstrued!  I'm afraid that leaves me no other choice but to help him!  He must have gotten a flashback from that hologram--well, to be politically correct, that "Pepper's Ghost".  I mean let's face it here he's already stolen and did exploit "The Floyd Mayweather Early Release Argument"...

-X1

DIANE DIMOND = YELLOW JOURNALISM

NO COLOR CUT OR CLARITY!

Diane Dimond I have come to the conclusion that you were the victim of some sort of pedophilia as a child. Perhaps you require some therapy for what ails you? You're a person who supposedly reports the news and you give more of your personal opinion than any factual content--for this reason I don't think you worthy of the title journalist.  The public doesn’t require you to do the thinking for them as you unleash an ill fated attempt to disseminate this garbage to the mainstream masses.  Pardon me lady, however, who cares what you assume?  It is your primary assumption that Michael Jackson was guilty of a crime he was acquitted of--it's your job to report facts.  

You as a media person are supposed to be impartial. We live in the United States!  Last I checked when someone is proven INNOCENT it means just what it states.  Michael Jackson isn’t the one which got away! Meanwhile, back at the ranch-- you consistently speculate and continue make your dubious comparisons!  With frankness and candor Diane you’re an absolute embarrassment to ethical journalism and professional integrity as a whole.  And when your personal career disintegrates many of us will be there to witness you self-destruct and implode. Yes, Diane Dimond, the journalistic trash peddler--an uncut, unpolished diamond with a multitude of inclusions!  You have no color, cut, or clarity to your madness—you’re Z Grade!

Michael Jackson went through the judicial process where he was judged via his peers.  Who are you to decide that you were a part of that jury? Moreover, the evidence proves that Michael Jackson was innocent and set up as a matter of extortion.  Any imbecile would see that and you don't need to particularly be fond of Michael Jackson’s art form for you to weigh the evidence!  What you can't do Diane is ignore the evidence presented at that trial which highlighted that child’s mother and showed us many inconsistencies with regard to testimony—crystal clear! Perhaps you should write an article on that?
 
What you're presenting here is a biased view; it’s non-factual and solely formulated by immense speculation. Conclusively the majority of your writings are derived solely from personal opinion. On a personal level I don't care for your opinion!  What I want are facts lady put your pen where your mouth is. Therefore, if you can't produce that in any of your writings the IMO's belong on Facebook and Twitter as they are the proper setting for that speculation and assumption.  You are quickly becoming a media parasite and a tabloid maggot.
 
What have you gotten out of your career thus far Diane?  Honestly lady, in what circle you’re taken seriously or considered even remotely important?  What are your contributions to journalism Diane a penned hate article here or there?  No one finds your brand of yellow journalism influential you’re so nasty and arrogant! You naturally assume by drafting such trash you can get some syndication?  There are no comparisons to be made between Jerry Sandusky or Michael Jackson this is all a figment of your imagination--the troubles of a beautiful mind.  Let’s face it Diane you’re a mental health issue with a pen!

-X1

yel·low jour·nal·ism 


Noun: Journalism that is based upon sensationalism and crude exaggeration.

BOOTGATE CD's/DVD's THIS IS BOOTLEG!

Unauthorized Michael Jackson Releases

X1: 

My goodness--this sounds like something out of Sex, Lies, and Videotape! I've just been informed that there is a version of a boxed set which has been re-discovered with respect to Michael's art.  Well, we've got the Lies and the Videotape part in the form of DVDs but we will omit the first part as that's not required here. 

 

However, this is a scandal--that it is!

ENTER BOOTGATE

Honestly, there are many different versions floating around with a template and logo in tow to dupe unsuspecting fans into thinking that they've got the real thing.  So we folks at INX decided to take this boxed set on a spin to see what it was all about.  The boxed set that we questioned would be the one depicted below.

As Seen On: "Alleged Michael Jackson Box Set"

Now this advertisement for the sale of this "alleged box set can also been seen by clicking here.

__________________
  

WARNING--NOT AN OFFICIAL RELEASE

BX:

MJ History Logo

Now I have just seen something weird on Facebook--really weird! Someone states that "BAD25" is supposed to be in stores for US$200 (?)--I checked amazon.com. The price for the Deluxe Edition is still at US$34.99.

This same someone wonders how the Staples Memorial made it onto a box set that was published in September 2009 since the contract between the Estate and Sony was only signed first half of 2010--last time I checked this box set is anything but an official box set. This same someone maintains that the Estate is ripping off the fans "once again"--last time I checked there is something for everyone's budget here. And what about the various reprints while Michael was among us--Ultimate, Essential, Thriller 25... were these also "rip offs"? 

 

BAD is celebrating its 25th anniversary this year *so it is legitimate to release a BAD edition on this occasion*. Even more, it is not just legitimate, it is REQUIRED. We can, of course, celebrate the 25th anniversary of BAD with a re-edition of Mozart's Serenade No. 13 for strings in G major (K. 525)... maybe this is what this someone is looking for?

__________________

X1: 

These charlatans will just mass produce vast bootleg quantities of a concert, slip the disks in a jacket, and sell them in a case with some MJ Logo!  This is what we've pegged as bootlegging in NYC.   Does anything below in that picture appear to have a Sony/Epic distribution label on it? I really can't fathom how anyone would be mistaken by this as it isn't misleading. There are no identifiable markings which connect it with the Estate of Michael Jackson or Sony/Epic Distribution none whatsoever!  It seems that people don't evaluate anything before they go amongst the community and spread falsehood everywhere they can regarding a sub-par product!  With things like this you don't know what may arrive at your doorstep. Again, I must reiterate and I do need to ask if China Wholesale,DropShip from China,China dropshipper appears to resemble Sony/Epic, Sony/LEGACY, Nocturne Productions, Inc. (Michael's production company of choice) or the Estate of Michael Jackson?

China Wholesale,DropShip from China,China dropshipper

I can't account for the rest of the world but that's what we call it here cut and dry--bootleg.  Let me say that not everything with an official looking logo is legit. Some people have actually been so bamboozled that they are mistaken concerning this one release in particular. Some people seem to think that this box set is legitimate--WRONG!!! THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU DON'T DO YOUR HOMEWORK. YOUR POSTS GET SMA$HED!  If anyone should purchase these types of things you do so at your own risk as this is buyer beware! If you think this is going to fly as a piece of valid memorabilia you are sadly mistaken and you will waste your money on something which has no value should collecting be your forte.

*Besides there's only been one "official release" of the Michael Jackson Ultimate Collection which I know of and I own a copy.
__________________

Just a few days after June 25, 2009 the Better Business Bureau issued a warning regarding merchandise related to Michael:

June 29, 2009:

"According to Smartmoney, before Jackson’s death, sellers listed an average 200 to 400 memorabilia items daily on eBay, but by the morning following his death almost 20,000 Michael Jackson-related items and memorabilia were for sale on the auction Web site. Items included autographs, gloves, posters, newspapers and even a Cheeto which supposedly predicted the death of the pop star. In addition to memorabilia, commemorative items are already being mass produced and sold to fans—including t-shirts and special edition magazines. Because the value of collectibles is largely dependent on how rare an item is, mass-produced commemorative items are not likely to appreciate in value."
Michael Jackson Memorabilia-Sentimental Value Only

June 30, 2009:

"At times like these, scams become abundant. And while collectors and fans want to snag a great piece of history, it behooves consumers to be cautious.
"The cause of Michael Jackson's untimely death still needs to be determined, and already people are seeing suspicious and awkwardly written e-mails appear in their in-boxes offering supposedly authentic items from the pop singer's life," Steve Bernas, chief executive officer of the Better Business Bureau office in Chicago, said in a statement."
Buyer Beware

It appears some people did not read those warnings!

Here is a recent, similar case involving Elvis Presley which just serves to show how ubiquitous this is:

"Copyright infringement lawsuits were filed in Florida last week and in England today on behalf of Elvis Presley Enterprises, which wants to stop the commercial sale of a DVD/CD set that it alleges contain bootleg recordings and audiovisual footage of Elvis Presley concert performances... The box set in question contains footage from a 1977 television special called "Elvis in Concert" as well as raw footage of Elvis in Omaha, Nebraska, and Rapid City, South Dakota, the Associated Press reports."

Elvis Presley Copyright Infringement

Moreover, this box set uses the History MJ logo which at the time of the publication of this box set (September 2009) was not owned by the Estate of Michael Jackson--see below--a clear warning sign for anyone halfway familiar with matters Michael.

"This year, he lost control of Jackson's trademark "MJ" logo to a German businessman, Wolfgang Rath. Rath runs TePax, a German investment company that owns the technology to make flat, wall hanging high-end stereo speakers. Rath said he made a deal with Jackson, via Wiesner, to put Jackson's (removable) image on the speakers. In turn, Wiesner ordered thousands of speakers for Jackson to give or sell to fans. "The problem started as MJ Net Entertainment never paid any of our invoices," Rath wrote to me from his sickbed yesterday. "So we have already delivered several systems, which they never paid for, and in addition we have about 10,000 systems in our warehouse, which were built for them. Our channels are totally filled up, so no one knows what to do with the product." Rath said he wrote to Jackson's representatives and got no response. Eventually, he said, TePax won two cases against Wiesner in court and gained the rights to the Jackson trademark. "But merchandising is not our core business and after another six months time of no reaction from mj net we start now our second step and try to sell our rights on the logo.The only problem is that exactly now MJ has a really bad image in Germany, but of course this can change. So we are now willing to do anything to sell some of the remaining stock and the logo to get a small compensation for our loss." One would think that buying back the Jackson logo would be something Sony would be mildly interested in. But Rath said Sony declined to get involved. "Their only comment was that they don’t deal with MJ any longer." He adds, "It would be a disaster if we send Sony a letter mentioning they are not allowed to use the logo any longer and they have to take back even all old CDs from the German market. This would cost them millions." Wiesner's German lawyer, Thomas Stein, told me yesterday that he was surprised to hear about his client's activities, but didn't know him well. Wiesner, through a spokesman, said that he never owned any businesses involving prostitution, just restaurants with bars. "I've never been convicted of fraud. Fraud was alleged, but the case was resolved," he said."

Fox News 2003

More details are available under the following link:

UD THE ULTIMATE DISRESPECT X1 Blogger

__________________

Wembley The Origin

X1:

Now let's take a look at this from the perspective of this concert, its origin and Michael:

"There has been several professionally filmed concerts released or leaked from Yokohama, Tokyo, Osaka and half of Brisbane. Despite these three releases and several amateur videos from various concerts across the whole tour, many fans are disappointed that professionally filmed full concert footage of the second leg has not been released. His Concerts in Tokyo and Rome (both in 1988) leaked in the Internet through collectors. However these collectors refused to release the full concert and only 15 – 30 Minutes were leaked. In August 2005, fans created an online petition to support an official release of a Bad Tour concert in 1988, with heavy interest in the release of a London concert at Wembley Stadium. Although footage of concerts at Wembley were prominently featured in promos and music videos such as Another Part of Me, the entire concert has never been released. Although the target was 10,000 signatures, the petition continues to grow even to this day, with a total of more than 20,000. Jackson himself stated he never wanted the concerts released in full, preferring fans to see him live. After rumors speculating the release of a concert in 2012 to mark the 25 year anniversary of the Bad album, Sony announced plans to release special 'Bad 25' packages on September 18, 2012, including a digitally advanced 'Bad' album, a CD of demos and outtakes, a live concert CD and the much anticipated release of a Bad concert from Wembley-Stadium, London on July 16th 1988, reportedly from Jackson's personal collection. The concert was attended by Prince Charles and Princess Diana. The footage sourced from a VHS in Jackson's personal collection."

Michael Jackson Live @ Wembley 

 __________________

MICHAEL'S WISHES

X1:

Now the question remains if Michael would have wanted this to be released to the public under the circumstances. While he was alive perhaps not--however he's not with us physically and I will take you to a statement that Michael once made:
______________


"I don't ever want to be buried I would like to live forever." -Michael Jackson

 vs. 

"Jackson himself stated he never wanted the concerts released in full, preferring fans to see him live."

Michael Jackson Live @ Wembley 
______________

X1:

Does anyone realize here that if these concerts weren't released we wouldn't have memorable moments like this one:

Moments like these come once in a lifetime. This moment which was captured above can't be recreated or duplicated. Once these precious moments are gone they're gone forever, I'm afraid. I say we hold on to those moments and this is critical.  It's critical because Michael isn't here to create new ones for us to enjoy. So here we have an opportunity to experience a concert which Michael did @ Wembley and I think we should be grateful that we're getting such an opportunity!  If we were to apply that statement in a general way which Michael made regarding his audience coming to see his show live and in full we wouldn't have the magical moments we have above. For the individuals that don't agree that this footage should be released I have the following to state to you below.
 ______________

UNSELFISHLY BRIDGING THE GENERATIONAL GAP

The only way I see remembering and honoring the legacy of Michael Jackson is by Michael living vicariously though his music and art in our hearts. I believe that when he was alive he wanted people to come and visually witness his art.  Just because Michael wanted us to see him live doesn't mean because he's not physically here with us he didn't wish for us to see it at all!  If we couldn't for some reason see him live while he was with us physically then we will now have the ability to cherish those moments by enjoying this never released video footage from Wembley!  I can't speak for you--no buts about it--I will be doing just that. I believe that every artist wants to share their art with people. 

GLEE

I think that they also want their art to continue to be relevant long after they've left the world in a physical sense.  I try not to be selfish and I think Michael has a place in the current generation and many to come.  Please allow them the opportunity which we had. I think that many are taking this thing with Michael saying no to things musically and artistically while circumstances were different too gravely.

I think that under these circumstances we'd find Michael's answers to certain statements to be quite different.  I also think that the reason he gave his estate the power to do what it needs to do is because he put that trust in them to continue his artistry.  He knew he had those demos, full songs, and unreleased footage so that he could secure the future of not just his children but his art as well (I state that will a huge smile).  Michael was brilliant when it came to things like this and I think for the most part we are going to get another really spectacular show!  There may perhaps be many which will disagree with me here and argue this point.  However, my state of mind is that if you don't support it don't ruin it for the people which do.  You have a right to support or approve of what you should choose--again please don't ruin it for others which are about to have some enjoyment in life.

______________

$Item Pricing & Fanbase Politics

X1:

For the record I would like to address something else. People are under the impression that the items for sale are expensive with regard to the Bad 25 promotion. I beg to differ there are items for everyone's budget from a record all the way up to an expensive one of a kind Bad 25 Jacket which is a recreation of the original Bad Tour Jacket. I'm going to give you a price rundown for all the items there and everyone can get what they can afford then I am going to post the price of another box set and allow you to view that :)

*Current prices denoted below are taken directly from the MichaelJackson.com website.  The URL for the site is provided at the bottom of this price listing:

• $6.99 Just Can't Stop Loving You 7" Single (Vinyl): Individually numbered, featuring rare spoken intro and the original B-side
  
  
• $12.99 Michael Jackson Live At Wembley 7.16.1988: Sourced from Michael Jackson’s personal VHS tape, the only copy known to exist

• $15.99 BAD - 25th Anniversary (2 CD): Includes bonus CD of additional material from the BAD sessions and new remixes CD

• $22.99 BAD - 25th Anniversary (Picture Vinyl): A unique picture disc featuring the tracks from the original album

• $44.99 BAD - 25th Anniversary Deluxe (3 CD/1 DVD): Featuring three CDs, two collectible booklets, and the first ever authorized DVD release of a concert from the record breaking BAD tour

• $199.99 BAD 25 Deluxe Collectors Edition: the ultimate fan experience, enclosed in a unique BAD-themed case

• $325.00 BAD Tour Staff Jacket: a replica of the BAD World Tour crew jacket

http://www.myplaydirect.com/michael-jackson/features/26880082
 

Now we will do some comparison shopping to establish what the average box set prices are set at for other well known artists.  You may click the pictures below to be taken to the respective sites which sell these items:

Nirvana - Nevermind [20th Anniversary Super Deluxe Edition] [Geffen] by Nirvana $107

$87.99

The Promise: The Darkness On The Edge Of Town Story (3 CD/3 DVD) [Box set, Deluxe Edition]

58.33 Queen 40 Limited Edition Collector's Box Set [Box set]

$44.99 BAD - 25th Anniversary Deluxe (3 CD/1 DVD) Featuring three CDs, two collectible booklets, and the first ever authorized DVD release of a concert from the record breaking BAD tour

I believe that is is now evident that the rampant rumors about the Michael Jackson BAD 25 presentation being a rip-off are apparently false. I will now proceed to put this in the proper perspective. If you've studied the information you're now aware that in comparison to the two other artists listed Michael's box set can be acquired at a considerable price savings. As you can see via the comparison above Michael's boxed set is in a normal price range. It's very important to remember that boxed sets are collectors items.  Being that this is the case usually the cost is more to develop them as they often have special inclusions that aren't the case with just a CD or a digital music purchase.  You pay the retail value for the production of any special box set inserts, books, or other materials.  It is also imperative that you ensure that you are getting an authentic and authorized copy if you are adding one of these to your collection.  If these sets aren't authentic they have no real collectible value.


-X1

Chris Rock: POOKIE FROM NEW JACK CITY

A.K.A. CHRIS ROCK 

WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT

"I love kids, not in the Michael Jackson way" joked Chris on the show."

Comedian Chris Rock's Insinuation
____________________

 X1:

YOU'VE OFFICIALLY BEEN MIJAC'ED

CHRIS ROCK PORTRAYS POOKIE THE CRACKHEAD FROM THE MOVIE NEW JACK CITY

Today I am addressing the insinuation which Chris Rock made regarding how Michael loved children. You know it's really sad that we're not past this in Black comedy. If any person as an African American can't see how they did Michael then they are blind! To be ridiculed by your own people when you were proven innocent of something and the truth was exposed after your death is sickening. What's wrong Chris they're not laughing with you anymore are they laughing at you instead? Did you need to mention the name of Michael Jackson now that we have a current promotion going on to give your name a little buzz. I know what it is you celebs do when things aren't quite going your way.

Prepare to be rocked Chris Rock:

Michael Jackson was found innocent and during that trial there were many things which were exposed about that family and their intentions! There were even things exposed about the previous allegations from 1993. So tell me Chris how does it feel to be a SELLOUT? You've come a long way from playing "Pookie the Crackhead" in the urban movie "New Jack City" but I still see traces of "Crackhead Pookie" in your actions. You know as a matter of fact we in my community thought you played that part so well that you were in fact really using at the time of the filming of this movie. However, we don't hold that against you if it is the case as it was just a rumor. Do you comprehend how rumors and statements can damage now?


 

"I love kids, not in the Michael Jackson way" joked Chris on the show."

Chris Rock's Insinuation

Sorry Chris we don't find that funny. at all.

-X1

GOING UP IN TMZ HARD

THIS BLOG IS IN RESPONSE TO A STORY WHICH WAS PUBLISHED BY TMZ TITLED:

Michael Jackson
Creepy 'I Can't Sleep' Letter
Yanked from Auction

X1: OK now I'm going up in TMZ Hard! What's so creepy about this letter? Michael's had nicknames for years one of which being the famous "Smelly" and other little sayings like Do-Do Head. They called Janet "Dunk" there are some sentimental things you just don't comprehend!

Therefore, don't attempt to evaluate them or venture into trying decrypt them. Now, as for this "Creepy" thing I'll tell you what's creepy they way you jump on the bandwagon whenever Michael Jackson gets some shine regarding anything and you think a stupid funky little story will trend.

*******************************

THE CELEB STALKERS & VOYEURISM

#1. What's creepy is this man is dead and you are still stalking him.

#2. What's creepy is that you made sure you published the contents of a man's private letter to the public!

#3. What's creepy and seedy is that you actually assume that this is earning pay with integrity!

#4. What's creepy is you stalk people all over the place and turn up in the weirdest places like trees and anywhere you can get a photo! It's Pookie TV Time!  If you know what I know you'd leave Pookie alone because he ain't had his hit!

 

#5. ***Now how's the for creepy?  It is a full frontal creep show that you can get paid for voyeuristic tendencies and have the public accept it! IMO many of you in that company require professional help and therapy! Which brings me to #6 and you can see that below!

 

#6. It totally wouldn't shock me if you plant cameras in the homes of celebs to see what they do in their personal time!  Now that's sick and creepy on so many levels to the max!

-X1